Why do you emphasize the possibility of impacts when this is not even necessary to explain the events that accompanied and followed the ice-age and led to the geomorphology we see as the result of water and ice-shields and their rapid melting?
When the surface of the ice turned dark because of the layers of vulvanic ashes interspersed, albedo ever decreasing, the melting would speed up and reach catastrophic proportions on the vast miles-thick ice-shields of the northern hemisphere.
There may have been meteorite impacts but we do not have conclusive evidence thereof. And what is more, Scriptures do not speak of such in the accounts about the flood. What we can see, however, are the massive impacts of water and ice on the global landscape.
A friend of mine interpreted "matar" in the Bible associated with "fountains of the great deep" as meteors that were striking the oceans.
*volcanic
I am sorry, no Freud intended, the u was German, the v sat next to the c (and my eyes still in early morning mode on dwarfscreen).
Why do you emphasize the possibility of impacts when this is not even necessary to explain the events that accompanied and followed the ice-age and led to the geomorphology we see as the result of water and ice-shields and their rapid melting?
When the surface of the ice turned dark because of the layers of vulvanic ashes interspersed, albedo ever decreasing, the melting would speed up and reach catastrophic proportions on the vast miles-thick ice-shields of the northern hemisphere.
There may have been meteorite impacts but we do not have conclusive evidence thereof. And what is more, Scriptures do not speak of such in the accounts about the flood. What we can see, however, are the massive impacts of water and ice on the global landscape.
https://youtube.com/shorts/8sL7nCIWUd0?si=GWESvGI7kQL0kCcJ