It was sarcasm. They found Krishna's city and it's huge. But if Dwarka (myth) isn't really a myth at all then perhaps neither is the Mahabharata a myth, rather history. Imagine what would happen. Hard to imagine it being allowed to happen innit.
As an example of hidden / distorted / re-written and fake history designed by the Abrahamaniacs to keep world history within their absurd 6000 year period.
Their history isn't entirely absurd. Creationists have excellent evidence for the Great Flood, which most likely occurred a little over 5,000 years ago. I cover that in my online book at https://zzzzzzz.substack.com/p/cataclysmic-earth-history. The Flood deposited most of the Earth's sedimentary rock strata. Some of the strata were deposited later, probably during the Younger Dryas cataclysm, which is also conventionally misdated. There's little or no remains of humans or animals or plants from before the Flood. The Earth is likely millions of years old, but the beginning of life on Earth probably can't be determined yet. If you don't consider any of this plausible, why did you subscribe? Do you have interest in the Younger Dryas or anything?
I'm certainly no scholar just a fairly bright fellow and all I meant and still mean is the 6000 year old universe is absurd and that's being kind. Among other things.
There's a reason they suddenly stopped excavating Dwarka..
It was sarcasm. They found Krishna's city and it's huge. But if Dwarka (myth) isn't really a myth at all then perhaps neither is the Mahabharata a myth, rather history. Imagine what would happen. Hard to imagine it being allowed to happen innit.
Most ancient myths were based on events in the sky and cataclysms on the Earth.
So too most ancient facts. Like Dwarka.
(there's no such thing as Dwarka)
There's a town by that name in India. Why do you bring it up?
As an example of hidden / distorted / re-written and fake history designed by the Abrahamaniacs to keep world history within their absurd 6000 year period.
Their history isn't entirely absurd. Creationists have excellent evidence for the Great Flood, which most likely occurred a little over 5,000 years ago. I cover that in my online book at https://zzzzzzz.substack.com/p/cataclysmic-earth-history. The Flood deposited most of the Earth's sedimentary rock strata. Some of the strata were deposited later, probably during the Younger Dryas cataclysm, which is also conventionally misdated. There's little or no remains of humans or animals or plants from before the Flood. The Earth is likely millions of years old, but the beginning of life on Earth probably can't be determined yet. If you don't consider any of this plausible, why did you subscribe? Do you have interest in the Younger Dryas or anything?
Thanks for your response, Len.
I'm certainly no scholar just a fairly bright fellow and all I meant and still mean is the 6000 year old universe is absurd and that's being kind. Among other things.
There's a reason they suddenly stopped excavating Dwarka..
Who was excavating there, for what, and why did they stop? I thought you said Dwarka doesn't exist, although there's a town by that name.