Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Hans Stein's avatar

Thanks for honoring me with such remarkable insights.

Regarding the ice-age, I am sure it began with the flood (Nov/Dec, Arctic polar night), and built up fast due to the high humidity and increased temperature gradients, Antarctica following). The massive burial of megafauna in the Arctic indicates a catastrophic drop of temperature.

I made a mistake above when I wrote 5000 b.c. for the African Humid Period. I wanted to write: b.p. (before presence). So that would mean: after the flood.

I am not sure if additional (cosmic) events are necessary to explain the end-of-ice-age phenomena, like the rapid melting. Vulcanic ashes with decreased albedo on the vast ice-shields could account for their melting so fast.

The western Sahara (Mauretanian Desert) shows signs of extreme water erosion, even the Atlantic Ocean off the coast treme dous amounts of sediments from that event, thousands of cubic miles of material. (I am fully convinced the Richat Structure had been chosen for habitation of that former preflood civilisation, as Plato relate's Solon's account by a priest/ sage from Sais in Egypt.

The similarities can not be coincidental. Even the sizes of the rings match, and the description of thus place surrounded by lakes and streams of water (before the flood).

I am curious and am going to watch and listen to the material you provided and shared.

Expand full comment
Hans Stein's avatar

Thanks Len for pointing this out. These submerged islands between the Azores were inundated with the rising seawater (~400 ft) after the ice-age (like Doggerland beneath the North Sea and some of these other areas you mention). These structuress then were built after the flood, like the Egyptian and the many other pyramids and ziggurats on the earth.

If we are looking for traces of an antediluvian civilisation, the Richat Structure which is a peculiar geological formation in the Mauretanian Desert of the wrstern Sahara shows numerous astounding similarities with Plato's accounts. He was speaking of a very large land with rivers and lakes and a capital resembling this Eye of the Sahara to a degree difficult to ignore. Before the flood the gegraphy of our planet was very different from what it is now (regarding its relation to the Pillars of Hercules) . Plato also does not say the land remained submerged but unreachable due to swamps and marches. (During the African Humid Period -~5000 years b.c. much of the Sahara was green and with extensive lakes and bodies of water, e.g. the Tamanrasset River.) Africa and the other continents (except for Zealandia) rose substantially in elevation due to the changes in pressure caused by the flood and ice-age. (The oceanic crusts are a lot thinner than the continental ones. Psalm 104 may have a memory of that. The Genesis description most likely refers to the land where Eden was in terms of the geography after the flood, the four rivers coming together (the two from Anatolia (Euphrates, Tigris), one from Persia (Gihon i.e. Karkheh), the other from Arabia (Wadi Ruma i.e. Pishon) when it was still green like the former Sahara.)

Expand full comment
15 more comments...

No posts